Home | The News
The News
How to Modernize Your Strategic Planning Meetings (Part 1 of 2) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Friday, 17 October 2008 01:23

How many executives actually anticipate their next strategic planning meeting? Is this the year to modernize or shake the staleness out of your strategic planning process?

In Part One of our recommendations, we offer some action steps to:

  • Generate new energy in your planning process
  • Increase enthusiastic organizational participation and
  • Boost the efficacy (or energy) of your strategic planning process (SPP) results

Most SPP's are similar in format. For example, participants perform an internal/external scan, GAP or SWOT analysis and set goals and accountabilities. Also, an in-house person often is appointed to facilitate the SPP meetings. Unfortunately, this can create roadblocks. Bias can influence the SPP due to the personal views of the in-house facilitator, or possibly his/her relationship with the SPP participants.

What value could a professional facilitator bring to your strategic planning meetings? 

Consider this. Besides eliminating the bias described above, the best professional facilitators are skilled in generating a high and highly productive energy level (using targeted group dynamics). They are also skilled listeners and have the ability to direct and sustain a laser, strategic focus on your unique organizational issues.

What if you utilized a facilitator who is also a group coach? How would someone with both of these skill sets improve the odds of successful strategic plan implementation?

The rise of professional group coaching/facilitation in corporate planning began about five years ago after a McKinsey & Company study estimated that approximately 80% of strategic plans were written, but never implemented.

Even with the best professional facilitation there can be occasions when critical, results-altering information does not come-out during SPP meetings. Also, there is usually the challenge with follow-through after the SPP is completed. This is where a professional facilitator who is also a group coach (group coach/facilitator) can help the SPP group identify "sins of omission" by using sophisticated and proven questioning tools (developed through research, training and practice) to create a more comprehensive, substantive SPP meeting environment. For example, a group coach/facilitator knows when, how and why to use a specific type of question to obtain an on-target response and active discussion.

Additionally, after the new strategic plan actions and accountabilities are documented by the SPP group, the group coach/facilitator is in an excellent position to deliver coaching support to the individuals or the group charged with implementing the new strategic plan.

In part two, we will look at an example of a SPP meeting and describe in more detail how group coaching tools, such as questioning tools, are used by a professional SPP group coach/facilitator to benefit any organization - including yours.

Last Updated on Sunday, 19 October 2008 20:38
 
Gaining The Ethics Edge PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Wednesday, 07 July 2004 09:54

Written by Darren Smith

A few quick stats:

  • 90% of managers rank themselves in the top 10% of ethical performers. Mathematically, this is not possible.
  • Less than 10% of managers have ever received more than one hour of ethics training in their entire career.

What's the purpose of a Code of Ethics really?

Ethics should not be treated as a "soft" topic, unrelated to the "hard" world of business. Ethics enhances the bottom-line, it does not dilute it. Example - is it safe to say that business ethics is not the first thing that comes to mind when one thinks of doing business in Russia? What comes to mind is a lack of business ethics. What does that do to the cost of doing business there? It makes doing business in Russia more expensive in terms of time, frustration and missed opportunities. Therefore making Russia less competitive in the world market.

Before we go further, lets make some distinctions. Standards are acknowledged measures of comparison for quantitative or qualitative value, e.g. weights and measures like ounces and pounds. Values are beliefs of what is good and bad. Regardless of culture, people differ very little about values, e.g. everyone wants their child to grow-up honest, courteous and charitable. Ethics is the "cost" a person will pay to uphold their values (the highest cost possible is putting others needs before your own which creates implicit trust). It is the way a person translates his beliefs into actions, e.g. everyone values honesty and when "push comes to shove" and their "honesty ethic" is tested, some people buckle under this test and others do not. Most people differ in their ethics rather than their values.

Situation

As the pace of imitations quickens, intangible assets (like ethics) are assuming an increasingly competitive significance in changing markets. As a result, organizations with clearly stated and executed ethics are likely to be stronger performers. Example - Nordstrom department store will cheerfully refund your money on a pair of shoes even if you decide you are unhappy with them two years after you bought them. Nordstrom's value of serving the customer is upheld, even at a high cost. They probably have the highest "service ethic" in business. The result for Nordstrom is higher customer loyalty and higher margins. People will pay a premium for trust.

How to do it

Exercise - Have members of your organization think of someone they trust implicitly. Have them write the primary adjectives related to "why" they trust this person.

Next, align these value perspectives:

  • values that your organization's management communicates
  • values that employees believe drive management's behavior 
  • values that actually underpin the interpersonal dynamics of the organization

Lastly, you can create your organization's measurable ethical standards by using the "trust adjectives" your organization generated in the step above as the cost you are willing to pay to uphold your organization's values.

How does ethics become a core competency in your organization? You can accomplish this by adding your organization's ethics to your job descriptions, professional development and annual reviews. Naturally, in-turn, your ethics will find its way into your negotiations, collateral and website etc...

Result

Ethics can add substance to your profession (what you deliver of value to your clients). It can also add professionalism in a way that can be seen, felt and measured (real ethical standards).

Lastly, ethics enhances your bottomline two ways: 1. by lowering transaction costs because of a high "trust ethic" and 2. by creating a hard-to-copy nature of your organization's ethical culture.

What would happen now if you stopped treating ethics as a "soft" topic?

Last Updated on Thursday, 14 August 2008 18:46